Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Nader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Nader (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INHERITED, not independently notable of Ralph Nader - Prisencolin (talk) 18:41, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: The coverage of her confrontation with Prescott Bush in 1955 is extensive. Plenty of coverage of her after she published her book including an interview by the New York Times. WP:BEFORE applies. I suggest this nomination be withdrawn. Toddst1 (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Plenty of coverage about her over time. I've copyedited and added to the article. Passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:51, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Plenty of independent coverage, including very high-profile sources. As I see it her notability derives from her activist role in obtaining a federal government response to the 1955 flooding, and additionally from her authorship of a cookbook and her obvious influence in shaping the lives and career paths of three notable children. -- Orlady (talk) 15:50, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Having just read "Nader: Crusader, Spoiler, Icon," I believe Rose Nader would deserve her own article for her influence on her son ALONE. However, as pointed out above, Ralph Nader is not the ONLY child of Rose to have his own Wikipedia article. So she deserves to be kept for her influence on all of her children.Amyzex (talk) 18:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY. FWIW, I'm not a fan of her son Ralph. Bearian (talk) 21:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep notability isn't inherited indeed, but there's more than enough about her specifically to merit an article apart from her children. SportingFlyer T·C 03:55, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.