Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubychem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rubychem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Non-notable software. SL93 (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: as a thoroughly non-notable gem. Over the gem's lifespan it has had 21,410 total downloads. wikipeda-client, which does not (and should not) have an article has over ten times that number. Furthermore, I can find almost nothing to establish its notability. TartarTorte 17:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Extremely few google search hits, no hits in the few databases I searched. With the low number of total downloads and basically zero people writing about it, there's nothing that suggests notability. Skynxnex (talk) 14:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.