Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rustle the Leaf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rustle the Leaf

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As much as I'm genuinely concerned with the environment, I'm simply not seeing any obvious improvement and there's no newer coverage than 2005 and 2006 as shown here, here, here and here and this simply hasn't changed since starting in August 2008. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging environmentalist Velella for comment. SwisterTwister talk 20:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article written very much like an advertisement with almost all substantial content from the article creator who was an SPA. I can find nothing that suggests that this is notable or even that it was notable in its time. Good intentions and probably helpful but not Wikipedia grade. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, unable to find anything useable, comic strip appears to have been produced to promote cleaning products, see [1], from 2003 onwards. Also, created by SPA who appears to be one of the comic strip creators. Coolabahapple (talk) 17:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.