Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rustlers
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
- Rustlers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I disagree with User:Martin451 that the recent refs estabilish notability. The sources seem problematic - either mentioning the brand in passing, or being niche (marketing releases, etc.). As such, I think that this article still fails Wikipedia:Notability (products). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Rustlers are in most major UK supermarkets and a notable brand in the UK.Martin451 00:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- @User talk:Martin451: saying so is not enough. Can you cite sources to prove it? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - Some of the sources regarding the ad campaigns are from industry publications, and would appear to be reliable. The rest aren't very good - press releases that establish the product exists but not why it is notable. I would say it does need some work. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 08:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Martin451 00:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Martin451 00:33, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Though Clean up is required to maintain WP:NPOV but page seems worth keeping. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 15:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as per Martin, They are a well known UK brand. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 04:38, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.