Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rutvik Oza (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rutvik Oza

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. A previous AFD argued that the subject had won the Filmfare award for best screenplay, but that is apparently not the case. What can be sourced does not rise to the level of WP:CREATIVE and coverage is not enough to pass WP:GNG. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment One of the previous AFDs referred to a mathematician, unrelated to this person. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:25, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The link at IBNLive had been then active, and thus had been referred to. As old links get obsolete, they are removed. Other similar links at IBNLive have been inactive as well. Link archive found at http://web.archive.org/web/20140302065412/http://ibnlive.in.com/photogallery/14375-7/photostory.html -- PartheshPatel (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CommentCo-written by Anurag Kashyap, Rutvik Oza is not nearly enough. Assuming you can source every single claim in the article, it amounts to just the person's resume, and there is simply no significant coverage of the subject individually. Even the nominations listed are not individual but as part of a team. This might be assuaged by winning a significant award, however that cannot be sourced either and I'm not even sure why it was used as a keep argument in the previous AFD. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Link fixed, if it does any good. PartheshPatel (talk) 07:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - article does not show that WP:CREATIVE criteria are met.--Rpclod (talk) 05:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:35, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Brief mentions do not count. Also fails to demonstrate that the subject should be considered notable even in lieu of sources under WP:CREATIVE. Msnicki (talk) 22:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.