Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. P. Bansal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 13:38, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

S. P. Bansal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like a CV (resume) of a non-notable person. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 02:50, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Agreed! Wgolf (talk) 03:12, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 6. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 05:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The main contributors to this article are three single-purpose accounts, Rajmay2013 (talk · contribs), Bansalnitish (talk · contribs), and Naujawan (talk · contribs). Two of these have removed the AfD notice from the article, and been warned not to do that. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:41, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
-I put up a page protection request. Also maybe you should start a SPI report? Wgolf (talk) 18:51, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am attributing the AfD removal to ignorance, and I don't think editing an article sequentially under more than one name counts as abusive, so unless they show up here trying to look like multiple independent editors I don't think an SPI is needed yet. But we can keep it in mind if the situation escalates. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:20, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom st170e^talk 19:34, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Has anyone actually noticed that he is vice-chancellor (i.e. professional head) of a university? It's not a very big one, but there is an argument that he meets WP:NACADEMICS #6. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom -- Wikipedia is not a CV. He does not pass WP:NACADEMICS for his vice-chancellor role as NACADEMICS just grants notability to someone holding the highest-level post (and there is a chancellor). --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:MILL. What is the purpose of having articles for all VC's of all universities in India?Athachil (talk) 11:35, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.