Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S5000F - International specification for in-service data feedback

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

S5000F - International specification for in-service data feedback

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG TheMagikCow (talk) 08:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG, as well as per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball} 09:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it is hard to figure out what the article is about. I think it might be some kind of European military equipment standard? Far too detailed to merit an article in a general encyclopedia, and is not titled in our normal way. A better case could be made for S-Series of ILS specifications but that one needs help too, to be written in normal English instead of government contractorish. No need to merge or redirect. W Nowicki (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unsure what the article is about - looks like some kind of protocol for something but is incomprehensible. DrStrauss talk 10:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails GNG and reads like an information sheet. Kierzek (talk) 16:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.