Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAS Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SAS Online

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company is not notable: I could not find any coverage (except company listings that - by nature - try to be exhaustive). Also, the author has a possible conflict of interest, judging by Wikipedia:Help_desk#My_Wikipedia_page_not_shown_in_google. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 13:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 15:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 15:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article about a brokerage firm, barely sourced to routine listings. The article text makes no claim as to why this firm would feature in an encyclopaedia (indeed, the indication is that the prime concern is appearance on Google) and I am finding nothing better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 15:06, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete as spam. No indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 15:08, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it appears to be a trademark infringement of the SAS website. See idiot in a hurry. Bearian (talk) 14:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.