Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCH Phase Display

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SCH Phase Display (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:45, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as CSD:G12. The text seems to have been lifted off a 2007 textbook. Owen× ☎ 15:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete for copyright violation. The textbook was published in 2005, the passage was added here in 2007, so it's clearly a copyright violation rather than citogenesis. DFlhb (talk) 13:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete: per WP:G12. Clearly a copyright violation, while it may be possible to have something here on this subject it'll have to come from a WP:TNT. User:Let'srun 22:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.