Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDF-1 Macross (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Super Dimension Fortress Macross. czar 15:04, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SDF-1 Macross

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What makes this fictional spaceship notable? Nothing in the old AfD's argument, that's for one. As written, fails WP:NFICTION and I don't see any sources discussing the spaceship in detail. Yes, there were some model kits, toys, etc. but I don't think that's sufficient. Let's discuss. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to The Super Dimension Fortress Macross as not individually notable. (Which should really be at Super Dimension Fortress Macross, which is where it is even on the Macross Wiki)._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 15:50, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:21, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of the sources from the previous AfD seem to have been able to be used to improve the article, so that likely means they were worthless. TTN (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Super Dimension Fortress Macross. Should not be deleted outright as this is the key fictional element in the series. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Super Dimension Fortress Macross. At the very least there is a mention in the article about this fictional element, I believe this can be salvaged in the future as a separate article if editors are willing to work on it. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.