Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIGSIM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Association for Computing Machinery#Special Interest Groups. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:11, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SIGSIM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough for its own article Rathfelder (talk) 13:29, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 13:29, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Association_for_Computing_Machinery#Special_Interest_Groups, where it is mentioned with all the other ACM SIGs. I was unable find enough sourcing to satisfy WP:GNG notability thresholds. According to our deletion policy WP:ATD, alternatives to deletion should be considered before deletion. Basic facts about this SIG are verifiable, however, and the SIGSIM is a plausible search term. Hence redirect is a reasonable alternative in this instance. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 00:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect is fine by me.Rathfelder (talk) 18:32, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.