Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SRM transports (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The "delete" arguments are stronger because Rsrikanth05 does not cite or discuss the sources that in their view establish notability. Sandstein 10:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
SRM transports
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SRM transports (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. Spam created by UPE sockmaster. Cabayi (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can't soft delete due to previous AfD
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Can't soft delete due to previous AfD
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: The article content describes a firm going about its business, without claim to notability. Aside from routine announcement and Q&A pieces, the text references investigation of the parent SRM Group (which has no article so is not a plausible redirect target). While taking note of the industry source also in the previous AfD discussion, I am not seeing sufficient significant coverage for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 10:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Article actually passes WP:GNG. SRM Transports has received significant coverage (you might want to check Google News), and also runs a few universities in India and is run by a prominent politician. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:05, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps, it can be Merged into an article on the SRM Group itself. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:11, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Notability is not inherited from T. R. Pachamuthu and his other activities. Is it SRM Transports which runs these universities (such as SRM Institute of Science and Technology) or is it the SRM Group? (Edit conflict to this point) I would agree that if there were an SRM Group article, then redirect of this article on the bus company could be done. AllyD (talk) 12:15, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.