Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSSniperWolf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SSSniperWolf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable youtuber. Has a lot of subscribers but the only reference is to a wikia. Youtubers are not automatically notable, fails WP:GNG. Laurdecl ^talk 08:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete WP:A7. Article contains no indication of notability. Exemplo347 (talk) 08:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think this would be eligible for A7, as being a popular youtuber sounds significant. Laurdecl ^talk 08:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No criticism was intended (although it probably sounds that way, for which I can only say sorry) - it's one of those highly subjective areas, and it's highly likely that I'm on the wrong side of it - all I meant was that personally, I didn't see any claim for notability. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 08:49, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think it was criticism, I was just trying to say that... actually, I don't know why I replied... Laurdecl ^talk 09:53, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per Exemplo347. Zero references other the the wikia mentioned above. Not substantially notable enough to pass WP:GNG. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball} 08:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedily delete as above. Article does make a claim to significance but it is wholly unsourced so I think it would qualify for WP:CSD#A7. DrStrauss talk 15:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedily delete - Non-notable youtuber.Fails WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.