Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sad ass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by Anthony Bradbury (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Reason: WP:A3, WP:G6, WP:G1. (non-admin closure) Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sad ass

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is, technically speaking, an article. Is this smth we need here in the main space? Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep under SK1, since "do we need this" is not an argument for deletion (also, I'm pretty sure interwiki redirects are redirects, not articles, so they have their own criteria, and in any case, Redirects are cheap. If it looks like it might be useful, it's probably better to give it the benefit of doubt) — Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
SK1 does not apply. If we are never going to have this article on Wikipedia (and I do not see the notability of the term) it should be deleted. This is not a redirect.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:27, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Plus tagged with WP:G1 and WP:G6. This article purely exist to redirect users to Wikitionary. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleted. as having no content. There was no need to bring it to this forum. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.