Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SafeTrade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SafeTrade

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly promotional. No evidence of passing WP:NCORP. Sources are mostly primary, user-generated or fail verification, and that's after one pass at cleaning them up. News searches show another company of the same name, and then press releases from a few years ago. I'm willing to be convinced, but so far there's not much in its favour. David Gerard (talk) 13:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 13:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 13:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 08:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as entirely PR and I in fact consider this entirely speedy material. SwisterTwister talk 22:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PR with PR refereences. The only availble RS that is more than a mention is ghe general article in Forbes, which does not mention the company . DGG ( talk ) 16:43, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- no indications of notability nor sufficient sources to meet GNG and CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:50, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.