Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sager Notebook Computers
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Sager Notebook Computers
- Sager Notebook Computers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article with no indication of notability. James500 de-prodded it because Google Books hits supposedly establish notability; he never pointed out any specific books, and all I can find there are passing mentions and business directories. Huon (talk) 12:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:00, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as it stands no RSes actually about the company - David Gerard (talk) 15:31, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Searched and couldn't find any sources providing significant coverage of this company. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.