Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn as reverted -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:57, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sajith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Citing only self-published sources such as the subject's Instagram, Twitter, and Blog page, this article contains no indication that its subject is notable. —BarrelProof (talk) 14:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:04, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: After reviewing the article history, it was a disambiguation page until some IP edits of 26 March and 14 April 2020‎ (UTC) when the topic was changed to a BLP by anonymous IPs 49.15.20x.xxx. I should probably not have filed this as an AfD. Instead I should have just reverted it to the revision as of 12:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC). —BarrelProof (talk) 15:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• speedy close and restore the redirect. Praxidicae (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per A7. Seems like an ordinary person, with no claim of significance in the article. No sources turn up upon search, except twitter and facebook ones."he posted a few pictures of a bird on his Twitter page,[1] and he has a Facebook account" Really? (Remark: this page was created from a disambig page. Would probably be a good idea to revert to the disambig page instead) --Dps04 (talk) 19:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Removing my speedy delete vote as the disambig page has been restored. --Dps04 (talk) 04:49, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - no need now, IP additions reverted and dab restored the IP is already prevented from creating the page under his own name. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:03, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While we're at it Sajith Sivanandan needs a look too In ictu oculi (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep is a given name dab page for four people.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:20, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep this given-name page (not a dab page). PamD 08:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.