Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Buchanan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 15:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Buchanan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established and probable hoax. Subject, if he existed, seems to have appeared only in a couple of low level tv series one of which doesn't even have an article and he seemingly hasn't done anything for over 10 years. A search of the birth records for Aldershot (where I live} for 1991 shows no such birth. Jack1956 (talk) 13:51, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 14:00, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 14:00, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 14:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 14:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as does not pass WP:NACTOR with not even a listing at IMDb and neither does one of the named television series and the other one has no mention of him or his character so am having strong suspiscions that this is a hoax article, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The sources provided are all either broken links or social media pages that don't provide any relevant information, much less information to support this person's notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Definitely fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. -- LACaliNYC✉ 21:15, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.