Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Cavanagh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Cavanagh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, most sources do not cover Cavanagh in-depth, rather 1 or 2 brief mentions. GMH Melbourne (talk) 05:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Entertainment, and Australia. GMH Melbourne (talk) 05:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No evidence of notability. Deb (talk) 17:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Each source is a 1 line mention of Cavanagh and not WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This one is easy as it clearly comes up short of GNG guidelines. Go4thProsper (talk) 21:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG. 181.197.42.215 (talk) 04:20, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.