Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Conn (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete given the low participation and a single WP:PERNOM comment. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Conn

Sam Conn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable individual, Google search turns up this article and a few other people with the same name. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:51, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:51, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:51, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Conn (2nd nomination), released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.