Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Lawrence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Lawrence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies entirely on promotional contents, trivial mentions or coverage of his company instead of himself. Searches of the name only returned results of a politician with the same name, with not much sources proving his notability nor the claims in this article. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 19:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: New York and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete PROMO for a non-notable executive, the ZDNet link is a podcast, that's about the best source there is. Rest are non-useful. Oaktree b (talk) 19:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete per above. CastJared (talk) 19:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not enough reliable sources exist. Pershkoviski (talk) 20:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.