Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samidh mukerjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ethically^Yours! 17:13, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Samidh mukerjee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable individual. References are all primary or of dubious reliability (i.e. IMDb-style webpages). Of lesser importance is the promotional tone used throughout the article (since that can easily be rectified). Primefac (talk) 23:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -I'm not sure how Times of India qualifies as a primary or unreliable source.. There I see a fair number of sources that establish notability of subject per WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO #1. Here are some from the existing article, -[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Most of the refs there are from TOI, but these are written by different authors, -is it a concern here? (if yes, I'll attempt to look for others). If not, what else? (contents can be discussed on respective talk page). Anupmehra -Let's talk! 02:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The coverage in the Times of India is quite pervasive. I also found this in a quick search. There is sufficient coverage to establish that inclusion in Wikipedia is warranted. -- Whpq (talk) 13:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the coverage detailed above, which meets WP:N and WP:MUSICBIO. — sparklism ^hey! 11:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.