Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Man
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Samuel Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Some mentions in local histories. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 02:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- keep for someone living 400 years ago that is quite a lot of detail including a multi-page biography that someone wrote about him. More than sufficient for a historical figure. --hroest 17:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Several new sources added. As noted, this is a fair amount of detail and record for someone so long ago. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 18:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.