Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Francisco Institute of Architecture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

San Francisco Institute of Architecture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school. The two sources in the article are useless for notability due to both being non-sequiturs and I'm not finding anything usable on a Google search (string: "San Francisco Institute of Architecture"); news results are all name-drops where someone is mentioned as having a degree from them and general is mostly the usual litany of profiles and user-generated content sites (i.e. LinkedIn and Glassdoor). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 07:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and California. Shellwood (talk) 10:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:00, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not an enough information about the school. 1736617483O (talk) 19:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. In spite of allusions to a variety of bona fide architectural resources, I only found this institute as a signatory to the Talloires Declaration. There is no entry for National Center for Education Statistics, and in fact, the Institute apparently is in violation of California's Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education Department of Consumer Affairs. The Institute employs 7 people and offers degrees entirely online. The current article is without reliable, independent secondary source— there are notices in various local news sources of events/speakers sponsored by the institute, but no sources discuss it in any depth. Enough said. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 01:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.