Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanam Arora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 22:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sanam Arora

Sanam Arora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person is not notable, if you compare it to their LinkedIn: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/sanamarora. They are not a prominent person. Additionally the article has been written by the General Secretary of the said organisation, MohanishB - https://uk.linkedin.com/in/mohanishb. So this shows bias and an attempt for one to promote their own cause. Rd897 (talk) 19:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No delete necessary. Notability obvious from awards. User rd897 seems to be using Wikipedia to satisfy personal issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unbiased135 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC) This is this editor's ONLY contribution to WP. Onel5969 TT me 16:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanam Arora, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.