Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sand bed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT#1. (non-admin closure) -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 18:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sand bed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Solution looking for a problem. "Sand bed" is somewhat of an idiom, and clearly since there are zero incoming links no one is confusing the terms listed on this dab. There isn't even a good target for a possible redirect. Primefac (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Sources indicate that there are multiple contexts for this including river morphology; water filtration; fluidized bed combustion; and horticulture. Andrew D. (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - another sensible and useful dab page. No reason to delete any of them. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 21:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, plausible and ambiguous search term. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 14:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Close please no question of deletion Siuenti (씨유엔티) 14:16, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.