Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandhar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After being relisted 3 times, participants of the discussion have not reached a consensus (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 02:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sandhar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn'r meet WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 03:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:00, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – In case the Sandhar clan fails notability, Sandhar should be kept as a disambiguation page because it clearly meets disambiguation criteria, as can be seen in this revision of Sandhar. If the clan fails notability, there won't be any primary topic left here. So, there won't be any need to add the tag "(disambiguation)", as per WP:DABNAME. In short, the revision cited by me will be a valid page in itself.

PS: WP:DISCUSSAFD states thatalternatives to deletion should be considered. If you think the article should be a disambiguation page, a redirect or merger to another article, then recommend "Disambiguation", "Redirect" or "Merge". Do not recommend deletion in such cases. - NitinMlk (talk) 14:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:58, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 22:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation as per comments from Nitin above Spiderone 18:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.