Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandy Hoyt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Hoyt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography, flagged as unsourced since 2009, of a radio and television personality, who has potentially valid claims of notability for some of his television work -- but nothing that would hand him an automatic presumption of notability just because he existed, if sourcing isn't there to get him past WP:GNG for it. Bearcat (talk) 14:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Ive added references to article and by this wayi think its completely notable fore Wikipedia Mr.ref (talk) 15:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. You've added a member profile on the self-published website of an organization he was directly involved with, a piece on the website of his own church in which he was the bylined author and not the subject, and his IMDb profile — which are all primary sources that cannot assist notability. To establish notability, sources have to represent reliable source coverage about him in media independent of him, such as newspapers, magazines or books — it's not enough to just use his own self-created web presence as verification that he existed. Bearcat (talk) 17:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- no indications of notability or significance; a run-of-the-mill radio personality. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The recent changes to the article do not convince me. No presumptuous claims for notability and WP:GNG is obviously not being met.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 06:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.