Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangamesh Upase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 21:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sangamesh Upase (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor roles only fails WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 16:17, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. A complete dearth of in-depth or persistent coverage in reliable sources (either news outlets or the literature), so fails basic notability guidelines; Likewise, since the sources reflect an absence of "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows", a "large fan base" or a "unique, prolific or innovative contribution" by him, the subject also fails WP:NENT. Thus other outlets, rather than Wikipedia, is the way for this biography to go, until his career trajectory improves. —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 17:50, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^Thanks, L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a run of the mill character actor with small roles. Bearian (talk) 16:00, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.