Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhi Sathyan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Santhi Sathyan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved from draft without being reviewed, clearly fails WP:GNG, setting a Guinness world record is not enough to pass the criteria. Theroadislong (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. Shellwood (talk) 17:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I acknowledge that the article may not currently meet notability guidelines. I request that this article be moved back to the **Draft** space instead of being deleted so that I can work on improving it with better sources. Digiflock (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It had previously been returned to draft so that is not an option. Theroadislong (talk) 20:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Kerala. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Given the move history of this article, which originated as the userpage for creator Digiflock (talk · contribs), someone might want to do something about the fact that Talk:Santhi Sathyan contains the type of messages that actually should be on User talk:Digiflock (a user talk page that should not have been moved)… (No opinion or comment on the article itself.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Well, World Records aren't notable here, so stories about doing a non-notable thing only, don't make you notable. Outside of the Record, this person has not done anything we'd consider notable. This is just a non-starter, nothing for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:49, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sign of Notability. Zuck28 (talk) 12:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Guinness record does not make the subject notable and the degree of significance of the subject and of role as athlete and trainer is not enough to warrant a page on the subject. Fails WP:GNG. RangersRus (talk) 14:03, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails Notability. Delete as per nominations. Guinness records doesn’t make person notable unless supported by other reliable sources. Rahmatula786 (talk) 03:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I note that two sources are reduplicated, so there's actually only five sources, and not one is reliable thus her and her stunt are unverified. Everyone knows that we are not a book of records nor social media. Bearian (talk) 11:10, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.