Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Jane Hamilton (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Sarah Jane Hamilton
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sarah Jane Hamilton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously kept because of much laxer standards a decade ago. Fails GNG and ENT Spartaz Humbug! 18:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per my analysis at the second AFD. Flimsy sourcing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:38, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete does not come even close to passing the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per the depreciated PORNBIO WP guidelines. Lubbad85 (☎) 19:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails GNG, the sources are not controllabile, much of the article contains trivial information. Westmanurbe (talk) 22:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.