Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah and Julia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Appears to be lots of mentions, but none that meet our criteria as reliable sources -- RoySmith (talk) 12:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah and Julia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article may fail WP:GNG. None of the recorded songs have charted nor do they appear in an album from the artists. They only appeared in a national pre-selection for Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2013 of which they did not win the pre-selection to represent their country. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 17:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - seems like they have released another music single after JESC. Seems like partly WP:GNG passes.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Not notable whatsoever. If they get a page wouldn't every performer who's ever performed in a (J)ESC national selection get one too? Doesn't deserve an article. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 04:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• This passes WP:GNG the only other input doesnt have a stance in guidelines but personal opinion.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:27, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Their music video here has close to a million views. Possible source here, source here, mention here, source here, mention here, mention here.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The third source from Oikotimes is unreliable. Prior consensus at WikiProject Eurovision deemed them as unreliable, as anyone can register a profile on the website and publish "news" without sourcing their content. All the other sources only state that they took part in a pre-selection, of which they placed third, so they never got to represent their country at Junior Eurovision. Of the 12 notability points at WP:MUSICBIO, they partially meet the first, the remaining eleven criterion they fail. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 00:52, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There is none of the in depth coverage needed for a standalone article. All the sources offered are just mentions or WP:ROUTINE. SpinningSpark 18:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per routine or trivial coverage in sources and failing all other criteria of WP:MUSICBIO. Bellerophon _{talk to me} 01:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I couldn't find any significant coverage that would make this not a case of BLP1E (the Eurovision contest). There's only one news mention of "'sarah and julia' eurovision" and "sarah and julia dutch duo" doesn't get anything that works, either. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 06:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.