Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarbel and Barbe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Acts of Sharbel . (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sarbel and Barbe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These two figures primary source for being known is the Acts of Sharbel. The names are neither common to the subject nor good for alternative spelling/redirects. Would like to delete this alternative article as the "Acts of Sharbel" already covers their known lives. JudeccaXIII (talk) 02:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - notable as saints. It sounds like this is actually a merge proposal (to Acts of Sharbel) but it is better to keep both articles. In any case, this is not the forum to discuss it. St Anselm (talk) 09:43, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough sources as a stand-alone article. Not enough anything to merge either. Fails WP:BIO. 2607:FB90:D8F:B1:1D32:C7C0:4208:FAEA (talk) 16:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Sarbel and Barbe into Acts of Sharbel, which consolidates the material, leaves a redirect behind, and complies with WP:CWW. Was this tried before AfD? Jclemens (talk) 02:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Acts of Sharbel which will cover the subject in adequate detail.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge one way or the other, but close this AfD because it snows on January 29. Bearian (talk) 19:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.