Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarhap Hair Line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 22:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sarhap Hair Line (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NCORP. KH-1 (talk) 00:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 00:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Couldn't find any references that meet WP:ORGCRIT.--CNMall41 (talk) 04:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:CORP. I note nothing links to this article. LibStar (talk) 05:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and South Africa. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No reliable sources found, and the topic has no notability at all. Timothytyy (talk) 14:26, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Does not appear notable or to have significant coverage. Fails WP:CORP. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:47, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, unable to locate and references that meet NCORP criteria for notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:15, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.