Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasha Rodriguez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sasha Rodriguez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Even with its impact, I'd still consider this a BLP1E; the subject can be covered in more relevant locations ViperSnake151  Talk  19:42, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, or Merge/redirect to MDMA#Adverse effects. This article details several cases (not just Sasha Rodriguez) of people reportedly dying from a combination of MDMA and water intake. There is nothing about that possibility at the MDMA article; it should be there to the extent it can be verified. The sources now in this article are probably not enough for verification, and if better sources are not found, the article should be deleted. If the result is merge/redirect, I will undertake the merge. --MelanieN (talk) 22:45, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. A preliminary look at Google Scholar suggests that reliable sources can be found. For an article like MDMA the sources must comply with WP:MEDRS. --MelanieN (talk) 22:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per some discussion at Talk:MDMA: if something is to be added to that article, it would have to be researched and sourced de novo. There is nothing in the current article that could contribute to that addition. The subject herself does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, so the article should be deleted. --MelanieN (talk) 21:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Insufficient references from reliable sources to support notability beyond a single event.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  03:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.