Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satellite map images with missing or unclear data
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 01:14, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Satellite map images with missing or unclear data (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a directory, not maintainable, because such things change over time and hence this info is inherently dubious. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- See related Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coverage of Google Street View. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Contains significant information. Scope is clear and limited. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC).
- The problem is that at any given moment the information is not trusted/stationary: it is not printed map we are talking about. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, as per Xxanthippe, above. Pristino (talk) 07:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:37, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:37, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. The argument that things change with time does not seem to make sense: the same is true of most articles in WP: all of them will always need continued updating. It can be dealt with either by updating, or, better, by keeping a record of the changes. DGG ( talk ) 18:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.