Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scandent Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scandent Solutions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't Meet Wikipedia notability guidelines Lakun.patra (talk) 10:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It appears from the history that this was AfD'd in 2006, with a decision of keep. I don't know how to find a record of the discussion... ? Meanwhile, this company mas merged and unmerged with other companies, some of which are listed on the Indian stock market. That's all the information I can find. LaMona (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the user tagged the page for AfD but didn't create a discussion page for it and then he removed the AfD tag too. Harsh (talk) 22:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NCORP. Harsh (talk) 22:47, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom and information I provided above: normal mentions in business press, but mainly about acquisitions and virtually nothing about the company itself. LaMona (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.