Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scomo Kill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted (A7) by Bbb23. (non-admin closure) Jim Carter (from public cyber) 06:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scomo Kill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Well I had this as a speedy earlier as it was a test. Now this could be interesting someday, but for now it just seems to be a too soon. (Though I do admit the site does sound interesting in a way) Wgolf (talk) 00:38, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unfortunately, with only 20 subscribers and 3,080 views, this YouTube channel is unlikely to pass the notability criteria for web content, and I can't find any evidence of significant coverage. Scomos, we're not saying that your channel is bad or unimportant; it's just that there currently isn't enough information out there from newspapers, books, or reliable tech websites like PC Magazine or Ars Technica to write an article about it. Altamel (talk) 01:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per A7. Web content with no indication of importance. —teb728 t c 01:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per A7 - I've tagged it under A7 - It'll probably get declined but if we don't try we don't know!, Per above no evidence of notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.