Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Circle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Circle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Sea Cow (talk) 15:10, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Sea Cow (talk) 15:10, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This one was a stub with scope for expansion, as demonstrated. (There's even more to be had on the 19th century use from that source, so scope for further expansion still, exists.) The road editors completely missed the wood for the trees again. Uncle G (talk) 22:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:25, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is a major traffic circle at the junction of prominent streets in Washington, D.C., and a contributing park to the Sixteenth Street Historic District (link)and L'Enfant Plan (link), both listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The article needs expansion with sources, not deletion. There's a book about The Neighborhoods of Logan, Scott, and Thomas Circles and it's covered in L'Enfant's Legacy: Public Open Spaces in Washington, D.C. There are also news articles including "District's 'Face Lifting' Cost $40,000,000 in '40" from The Washington Post, and 1 2, 3 from the Evening Star (notability doesn't exclude using old sources). APK whisper in my ear 22:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Bednar book alone has, what, more than five or six pages on Scott Circle. Clearly notable, and there are lots of interesting things to write up. Drmies (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Drmies, there's significant coverage here. Hog Farm _Talk 14:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. While I don't have access to the book sources, I will assume good faith and that they do cover the subject. Meets WP:GNG.
Keep. Don't know what this article looked like before, but at present it is a well-developed and well-referenced work covering its topic in considerable depth. --JBL (talk) 15:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.