Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Nickles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Nickles

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass GNG. All sources are either primary such as election results or his LinkedIn page. Grahaml35 (talk) 19:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Police, and Illinois. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:58, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article is so small and the number of sources are so limited. You probably do not have any relation to the article anyways. There is absolutely no reason to delete this article. AlexIAm1415 (talk) 20:50, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Typical coverage for a mayor [1] is what i find, but there isn't enough to prove notability. Ran for office and is now mayor, very typical coverage for anyone in his position. Oaktree b (talk) 21:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Having a extremely limited amount of reference is a very good reason to delete. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found a few very mundane articles about his activities as mayor in local press. But far from anything that would rise to notability. Lamona (talk) 04:42, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is minimal coverage or significant articles about his activities as mayor in the local press. Given the small size of the town, there is little evidence to support widespread notoriety or notability. Saliham (talk) 17:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.