Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screaming Tea Party
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Screaming Tea Party
- Screaming Tea Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBAND, non-notable JMHamo (talk) 19:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
keepas per this: [1] news google search on "Screaming Tea Party" + band. A news google search for a band that has been defunct for several years shows only the tip of the iceberg (in this case a smallish iceberg) of notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)- Comment - Trivial mentions does not make them notable. JMHamo (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Human3015Let It Go 21:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Human3015Let It Go 21:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete for now and draft & userfy at best as none of this suggests solidly better satisfying. SwisterTwister talk 00:00, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm not finding enough in-depth coverage from reliable independent sources to show they pass the notability criteria. Onel5969 TT me 12:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- change to no opinion; instead of doing further searches, I defer to editors who follow the music scene.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.