Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scriptics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Scriptics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the sources demonstrates any real notability. One is from a site that explicitly promotes local companies, another is a pandemic-era puff piece and the third is a no-name award handed out to almost two thousand other firms that year.

On a lighter note, the creator is probably a paid editor, but notice how his output is already declining in quality. His first effort, OneHope Wine, was pretty thorough. His next, Gabe Gutierrez, was so-so. This one is already quite skimpy. His next, Draft:Arnifi, is even worse. At this point, he’s just phoning it in. Biruitorul ^Talk 08:23, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Romania, Internet, Software, and Companies. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 10:13, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom, blatant failure of WP:NCORP. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:04, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete WP:NCORP fail. Does not have the WP:CORPDEPTH needed. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 17:19, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.