Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Janoski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no result, article was speedied as G11. — Gwalla | Talk 19:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Janoski

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a case of WP:TOOSOON, the article suffers from the promotional tone ("") and the "this is the next big thing" advertising tone: "Video Filming for first major release"... "First Major Record Deal". References are either insufficient (IMDb) or regional (Lancaster Journal). In good faith, I'd like to ask the article's author, User:VCoppola, to disclose his relation to the subject: this article looks like it's a PR piece written by a worker at whatever PR company is representing the subject, without any disclosures required by WP:COI. Or a family member, per "Paul Janoski" photo attribution at File:Sebastian Janoski Profile pic.jpg, which is also covered by that policy. Ps. Pinging User:Timtrent who accepted this at AfC. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.