Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secondment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn to allow time for people to work on what they believe is a promising stub with room for improvement. (non-admin closure) Exemplo347 (talk) 16:56, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Secondment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:DICDEF. This was previously a redirect to Wiktionary and for some reason, it has turned into an article that lays out the dictionary definition of the term. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article is nothing like a dictionary entry such as found on Wiktionary – there's no focus on the the word qua word; no etymology, grammar and the like. WP:DICDEF explains that there is perennial confusion between stubs and dictionary entries and that what we have here again. The topic has considerable notability as the process is common and so the HR profession has written plenty about it. Andrew D. (talk) 19:07, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:56, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: for discussion on notability
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, » Z0 | talk 08:32, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is a valid stub and promising article one someone an work on it. The very first reference in the article is whole academic book discussing the concept. More so in sources like this (Dutch). –Ammarpad (talk) 16:12, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.