Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SecurityTrails

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SecurityTrails

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see any significant independent RS cited on this page. Google search does not yields anything solid either so apparently the company does not appear to meet relevant notability guideline WP:CORPDEPTH and even lacks trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Saqib (talk) 13:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:04, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:04, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could not find any reliable sources to be able to establish notability for this company. Fails both WP:CORP and WP:GNG. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.