Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seetha I. Wickremasinghe (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete and salt per WP:CSD#G4. The new article was much shorter than the deleted version, but contained no new material not already present in the deleted version. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seetha I. Wickremasinghe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, person not notable. Fails GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y_SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y_SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y_SA ^{Y L}E _S 15:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Please SALT the page since this is being repeatedly recreated. Thanks, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 15:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. This is simply a recreation of an article that has recently been through an AfD process and been deleted. No new evidence has been proposed to establish the subjects notability. Dan arndt (talk) 15:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.