Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seileag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seileag

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, no significant RS coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 19:40, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:36, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: As well as several Google Books snippet views, this crypto-zoological creature is covered - though not by name - in this 2013 BBC report. (Note also that it is listed with a second distinct reference on List of Scottish loch-monsters.) If there isn't enough positive material to sustain a distinct article, an alternative could be merger into the Loch Shiel article? AllyD (talk) 08:14, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:31, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:31, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 22:17, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:24, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also could not find significant coverage beyond fringe sources. :bloodofox: (talk) 20:16, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.