Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sektor 304

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 15:42, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sektor 304

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still no evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, even after being tagged for notability since December 2012. The references include Sektor 304's own web site, several dead links, pages merely listing the fact that Sektor 304 took place in concerts or festivals, or with merely brief passing mention of Sektor 304, and AllMusic, which is no evidence of notability, as its stated aim is to include "every artist who's made a record since Enrico Caruso gave the industry its first big boost". There is also one review of a CD, but that alone is not much evidence of notability, especially as the review is on a web site which does not appear to be very significant. (A PROD was removed by the editor who created the article, with an edit summary saying "Cited sources, will need AfD". I'm not sure whether that means that the editor thinks that any article with any sources cited can't be deleted by PROD, or what.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - searches turned up a few trivial mentions on News and Books, virtually nothing on Newspapers, Scholar, Highbeam or JSTOR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:03, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It appears that there is no significant coverage, and very little coverage at all. Fails WP:BAND. --Bejnar (talk) 22:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as I simply found nothing better than this. SwisterTwister talk 05:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.