Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Semmel Concerts Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semmel Concerts Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. There are lots of claims of notability in the article, but I could not find any coverage to verify them. ubiquity (talk) 18:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the article on Semmel's director, Dieter Semmelmann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), because that article also does not meet WP:GNG, and the notability seems to depend on that of Semmel Concerts Entertainment. ubiquity (talk) 18:11, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 19:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 19:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 19:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Sampling the news on him from the past year or so, it seems to mostly be sporadic mentions, news releases, and one-off quotes. I can't see this passing WP:BIO, as the individual mentions together don't really contribute much beyond identifying him by his name and role. As for the company, there also seems to be no in-depth coverage. GAB^Hello! 21:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both as searches found only expected mentions, nothing convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.