Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senile Team (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 15:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Senile Team

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non notable company bombarded with interviews, primary sources and passing mentions. Interviews are the company taking about themselves, not independent. Company lacks coverage from multiple independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 15:17, 7

March 2016 (UTC)

Keep Interviews are used as situational references. There are plenty of references that are not interviews in the article. Including from big websites like 1UP and Kotaku.--Cube b3 (talk) 19:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Weak keep, there are a couple of WP:VG/RS sources (thank you, custom Google search engine) that are specifically about the company, but the bulk of which Senile Team is mentioned in reviews and articles about their work. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 10:15, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which ones? duffbeerforme (talk) 13:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two interviews two be more specific, Destructoid and Nintendo Life. The rest just mentions Senile Team as "the developer of..." soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 08:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Senile Team talking about themselves, not independent. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see your point. No, in that case there aren't any reliable sources. Changing vote.

That's how interviews work. A notable website found the developer notable and interviewed them where they answered questioned about themselves. It makes for a more interesting read.--Cube b3 (talk) 18:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG. Per WP:INHERIT, the developer of a notable game does not make the developer notable. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 14:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources not reliable enough to establish general notability, not to mention the strict guidelines for companies. ZettaComposer (talk) 12:38, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough in-depth coverage about the company to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:19, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.